The U.S. Supreme Court has declared there is no basis for Mexico’s lawsuit against American gunmakers, unanimously striking down a lower court’s decision that had allowed the case to proceed. The suit had accused Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence.
Mexico’s complaint detailed a scheme where gun companies allegedly maintained a distribution system that facilitated the transfer of weapons to “straw purchasers” who then supplied them to criminal organizations. The lawsuit also took aim at the companies’ alleged marketing of “military-grade” weapons to attract cartel demand.
However, the Supreme Court disagreed with the lower court’s finding of plausible allegations. Justice Elena Kagan, delivering the opinion for the unanimous court, stated that Mexico’s complaint did not sufficiently “plausibly plead” that the companies had aided and abetted unlawful sales, reinforcing the protections of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
This legal outcome comes amidst a strained period for U.S.-Mexico relations, with persistent disagreements over trade, immigration, and efforts to combat drug trafficking. Mexico’s government views the unchecked flow of U.S.-made firearms as a direct threat to its national security and economic stability.