While Donald Trump’s supporters have touted a flurry of recent endorsements for his Nobel Peace Prize candidacy, a crucial detail is being overlooked: the deadline. Nominations from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the government of Pakistan arrived after the February 1 cutoff for the 2025 prize, rendering them irrelevant for this year’s decision.
The only valid, high-profile nomination for the current cycle mentioned in reports is from U.S. Rep. Claudia Tenney, who submitted Trump’s name in December for his work on the Abraham Accords. This is the nomination that the Norwegian Nobel Committee will actually consider for the prize being announced this week.
The later nominations, while politically significant, will have no bearing on the 2025 outcome. They can, however, be considered for the 2026 prize cycle. This procedural detail is important, as it clarifies that the case for Trump being evaluated by the committee this year is narrower than some of the recent media reports might suggest.
Even with the valid nomination from Tenney, experts remain deeply skeptical of his chances. The committee’s evaluation goes far beyond the number of nominations a candidate receives. They conduct a thorough review of the nominee’s entire record, weighing their achievements against any actions that may have undermined peace and international cooperation.
So while the news of endorsements from world leaders may bolster Trump’s political narrative, it does not change the fundamental calculus for the Nobel committee this year. They are working with a specific set of nominations and a well-established set of criteria, neither of which are likely to lead them to select Donald Trump as the next laureate.
62